Breaking News

P&G Loses Battle in Toothbrush Infringement Case

December 9, 2005

U.S. federal appeals court sent a patent infringement lawsuit against Procter & Gamble back to district court in Oklahoma, passing on a summary judgment in favor of the company.
The plaintiff, Alfred Salazar, holds a patent for a toothbrush that both polishes teeth and stimulates gums, using special rods for each task. He sued P&G for alleged infringement of that patent, according to Reuters. P&G argued that its toothbrushes do not include an elastic feature as claimed in Salazar’s patent.
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma granted P&G a summary judgment in 2003, Reuters reported. A summary judgment is a decision made based on statements and evidence presented without a trial. It is used when there is no dispute over the facts of the case, and one party is entitled to judgment. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said the district court erred in granting judgment. It remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings.
blog comments powered by Disqus
  • ‘Lash’-ing Out!

    ‘Lash’-ing Out!

    Christine Esposito, Associate Editor||August 29, 2016
    All eyes are on Lash Star Beauty, a lash-centric beauty brand that recently made its QVC debut.

  • Long Term Sustainability In the Nonwovens Market

    Long Term Sustainability In the Nonwovens Market

    August 23, 2016
    Learn more at Cleaning Products USA, Nov. 9-11, 2016

  • Fro Yo!

    Fro Yo!

    Tom Branna, Editorial Director||August 22, 2016
    Project Beauty dishes out Hairgurt, a line of vitamin-rich hair shampoos and conditioning masques.