Editorial

Kids Cosmetics

By Tom Branna, VP/Editorial Director | October 1, 2008

Will shoddy science trump solid research? You bet, if the Environmental Working Group (EWG) has any say in the matter. Late last month, the newswires were filled with articles about how teenage girls are apparently chock-full of dangerous chemicals—all due to the use of cosmetic products. The chief culprits? Parabens (methyl and propyl), synthetic musk, phthalates and triclosan. According to the EWG, the high levels found in the test group can be attributed to the fact that adolescent girls typically experiment with more body care products than adults use. Teens in the EWG study used an average of nearly 17 personal care products each day, while the average adult woman uses 12 daily.
   
All of these ingredients have been in the news for the past couple of years, but the study only looked at 20 girls, ages 14 to 19, in the U.S. In the report, author Rebecca Sutton, a staff scientist with the EWG, says she found 16 cosmetic-related chemicals in the girls. In addition to the small size of the study, Dr. Sutton also admitted that levels of these chemicals in the girls’ bodies didn’t necessarily match the amount of the chemicals they consumed through cosmetics.
   
Still, the questions surrounding the study’s thoroughness hasn’t stopped the EWG from calling for the government to set safety standards for the ingredients in cosmetics.
   
“EWG has chosen to publish data that support its agenda rather than providing a full picture of the body of scientific research on these issues,” said Kathleen Dezio, a spokeswoman for the Personal Care Product Council. “There are hundreds of scientific studies that have evaluated the health impact of these ingredients.”  
   
The study by the EWG is only the latest in a series of attacks on the cosmetics industry. This month, columnist Harvey Fishman reviews some other dubious findings regarding cosmetics (see Gleams & Notions).
   
Also this month, be sure to check out our Contract Manufacturing/Private Label Directory. It’s a great resource when you need to find a partner to manufacture a wide range of household and personal products.
   
We hope you enjoy this edition of Happi. As always, we welcome your comments and suggestions.

tomb@rodpub.com

Related End-User Markets:

blog comments powered by Disqus
  • Of Diaper Rash and Drones

    Of Diaper Rash and Drones

    Christine Esposito, Associate Editor||June 30, 2016
    Where was the Amazon Dash button when I was a new mom?

  • More Moisture? Yes, Please!

    More Moisture? Yes, Please!

    Christine Esposito, Associate Editor||March 29, 2016
    The new Sothys Hydra3HA Treatment quenches dry skin.

  • Of Maps and Moisturizer

    Of Maps and Moisturizer

    Christine Esposito, Associate Editor||August 26, 2015
    Men don’t think they need to ask for directions, and they don’t think they need skin care products either. Can the industry cash in on these lost souls?

  • Successful Sensory Change

    Successful Sensory Change

    March 29, 2016
    How Seventh Generation changed a fragrance without losing consumer appeal.

  • The Definition of Beauty

    The Definition of Beauty

    Andrew Miller, MD, Associates in Plastic Surgery||July 13, 2015
    It's always changing, but plastic surgery can help.

  • FDA Is Back on the Prowl

    FDA Is Back on the Prowl

    Raqiyyah R. Pippins, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP||May 11, 2015
    Two Warning Letters allege certain personal care products intended for dark spots, redness or wrinkles are drugs.