A biting wind and falling temperatures—let alone a rocky economy—didn’t put a damper on festivities at the annual meeting of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists (SCC), which was held Dec. 10-11 in New York City. Long-time industry veteran Janusz Jachowitz received the Maison G. deNavarre Medal award during the awards luncheon (see sidebar), while Robert Lochhead took the gavel from Gary Agisim as president of the Society. The meeting also included more than 80 poster presentations from industry suppliers.
The annual event got underway Dec. 10 with a session on sunscreens moderated by Mindy S. Goldstein. Craig Bonda, Hallstar, detailed how his DEXSTER (DEactivation of EXcitedSTates by Emissions and Radiationless pathways) system enables formulators to understand all the things that happen between excited states and ground states of a UV filter.
From left, Dr. Bob Bianchini, Dr. Janusz Jachowicz, the 2009 Maison de Navarre Medal Award recipient and Gary Agisim, 2009 SCC president.
Irritation is a problem with some UV formulas, but Howard Epstein of EMD Chemicals explained how encapsulate
Janusz Jachowicz Earns deNavarre Medal Award
Industry veteran and hair care expert Janusz Jachowicz received the Maison G. deNavarre Medal Award during the awards luncheon at the 2010 Society of Cosmetic Chemists (SCC) annual meeting.
In presenting the award, Bob Bianchini of Johnson & Johnson, told the audience that Jachowicz has more than 100 patents and publications, has been a recipient of the Thomas A. Edison award and is considered the “best in the business” when it comes to hair care.
In accepting the award, Jachowicz thanked the Society, his employers during his 21-year career and his colleagues. “Formulators are the essence of the industry,” he said.
Other awards and award winners at the meeting included:
Shaw Mudge Award (best paper presented at the scientific seminar) sponsored by BASF: Trefor Evans, PhD, “Quantifying Differences in the Propensity for Breakage in Afro and Caucasian Hair.”
Allan B. Black Award (best paper on makeup technology presented at the annual seminar or meeting) sponsored by Presperse: Rodolph Korichi, Delphine Pelle-de-Queral, Germaine Gazano and Arnaud Aubert, “Why Women Use Makeup: implication of psychological traits in makeup functions.”
Hans A. Schaeffer Award (most innovative paper presented at the annual seminar or meeting) sponsored by Arch Personal Care Products: Renee Bolden, PhD, Dirk Domaschko, Julie Lubbers, Jeni Thomas, PhD, Mark Brown, Marge Peffly, PhD, and Yujun Li, PhD, “Flow Cell Microscopy: a Novel Method to Visualize Product Deposition on Hair.”
Joseph P. Ciaudelli Award (best article on hair care technology published in the Journal of Cosmetic Science) sponsored by Croda Inc: Yin Z. Hessefort, Brian T. Holland and Richard W. Cloud, “True Porosity Measurement of Hair: A New Way to Study Hair Damage Mechanisms.”
Des Goddard Award (most innovative paper on polymer science presented at the annual meeting or seminar or published in the Journal of Cosmetic Science) sponsored by Arch Personal Care Products: Yan Zhou, Linda Foltis, David Moore, PhD, Ray Rigoletto, Wosson Solomon, Grisel Tumalle and Xin Qu, “Characterization of Hair Damage and its Effect on Hair Color Fading and the Routes for Color Protection from Shampoo Stripping.”
Society of Cosmetic Chemists Award (best paper that makes the greatest contribution to the knowledge of protecting against or ameliorating damage to human skin caused by exposure to UV radiation) sponsored by The Hallstar Company: “SPF Retention via Silicone Derivatives,” Stacy A. Mundschau, Corey T. Cunningham PhD and Scott W. Wenzel, Kimberly-Clark.
The encapsulation technique has other advantages; for example, you can put the active in a water phase and encapsulates can be used to boost SPF. However, Epstein warned that the encapsulation technology is very formulation dependent—alcohol will erode it.
Craig Frischling from Ruger Chemical with Dr. Ricardo Diez of Chanel, the Keynote Award Lecturer.
Moving on to something completely different, Nadrian C. Seeman of New York University delved into the complex world of DNA modeling in the SCC Frontiers of Science lecture. In his opening remarks, he urged the audience to put aside DNA’s traditional double-helix image and introduced everyone to a variety of branched species and Borromean rings. Multi-tile DNA arrays have also been used to organize gold nanoparticles in specific arrangements, according to Seeman.
Modeling and Data AssessmentThursday’s afternoon session, devoted to modeling and data assessment, was moderated by Martha Tate of Kimberly-Clark. George Fitzgerald of Accelrys, Inc., detailed an advanced regression model for soap reformulation. His method leverages ingredient information, together with rules to create reliable regression approaches that answer the question, “what was it about that particular ingredient which worked?”
His software methodology puts the focus of the modeling not so much on the use of a statistical method once the data is gathered, but on the gathering of the data in the first place.
“Our approach produces predictive models which can be used not simply to understand existing processes, but to discover new ones,” he concluded. “This distinguishes it from approaches which treat data using categorical modeling methods.”
James Hayward, Applied DNA Sciences, put a different spin on DNA and its applications when he explained how the material can be used to authenticate individual ingredients, batches and even entire product lines. Hayward noted that the global cosmetics and toiletries industry loses $3 billion a year to counterfeiters. DNA markers, he said, can be used to defend the supply chain and even check compliance in clinical tests.
Evaluating Skin RadianceDavid Boudier explained Silab’s approach to evaluating skin radiance. The study was conducted on 100 volunteers using a VISIA CR device to capture images for the instrumental assessment and via sensory evaluation.
Dr. Rodolphe Korichi, LVMH (left) receives the 2009 Allan Black Award from Stuart Axelrod of Presperse.
The session’s final speaker, Dominik Imfeld, DSM Nutritional Products, explained how his company used snake venom as a biomimetic design model for the treatment of skin wrinkles. Specifically, DSM isolated Waglerin-1 in snake venom, which is a polypeptide with a chain length of 22 amino acids, a molecular mass of 2522Da and an intramolecular disulphide bond between Cys9 and Cys13. Researchers created an H-beta-Ala-Pro-Dab-NHbenzyl peptide derivative, prepared it in a cosmetic formulation at 100ppm and compared it to commercially-available acetyl hexapeptide-3 (50ppm). The DSM material proved to have significant advantages over existing wrinkle reducers on the market, according to the test results.
Friday’s technical program included a morning session on skin biology moderated by Randy Wickett, University of Cincinnati.
Formulation FundamentalsThe afternoon session, moderated by Lochhead of the University of Southern Mississippi, was devoted to formulation fundamentals. The keynote award lecture by Dr. Ricardo Diez of Chanel, Inc. was sponsored by Ruger Chemical.
Diez provided a review of the progress of foaming cleansing products during the past 50 years. His presentation focused on key improvements in the foaming cleanser category since the International Federation of Societies of Cosmetic Chemists (IFSCC) was founded in 1959. The timeline of the presentation started in the 1920s, when soap (first generation) was the only available cleanser. The second generation of cleansers resulted from the discovery of new surfactants in Germany in the late 1920s. According to Diez, modern surfactant-based cleansers offer, relative to soap, improved mildness, lathering, cleansing and rinsing, as well as convenience. These advanced hydrating cleansers are based on surfactants. Cleansers with reduced irritation to the eye and skin, first patented in the 1950s, were the basis of the third generation, represented by mildness. The fourth generation was described as products with conditioning benefits to hair or skin achieved by the deposition of conditioning agents. The fifth generation was presented as the most advanced, for it offers real hydration to the skin, in addition to cleansing, mildness and conditioning.
Dr. Trefor Evans receives the Shaw Mudge Award from Colleen Rocafort of BASF.
Lisa Flugge-Berendes of Kimberly-Clark Corporation presented data on how to improve moisturization properties of hand sanitizer formulations. It is well known that alcohol-based sanitizers can be drying and irritating to the skin with repeated usage. Her team investigated two delivery systems—alcohol-gel and non-aerosol pump-foaming alcohol solution. They contained humectant and occlusive ingredients to counteract the drying effects of alcohol and offer superior moisturization compared to other similarly marketed products. Moisturization levels were determined using industry standard of conductance. Measurements were taken before application and at 30 and 120 minutes post application on the forearm to determine moisturization levels. Alcohol level provides antibacterial efficacy against commonly found skin surface bacteria such as staphylococcus, streptococcus, pseudomonas and trichophyton which are capable of causing primary, secondary, systemicand even nerve infection to compromised skin. It was pointed out that on average, the face is touched around 15 times an hour. Hospital-acquired infections caused 100,000 deaths in 2002 and cost $28-33 billion annually. Hence hand hygiene compliance is a solution depending upon effectiveness of prevention measures.
Rebecca Peevers of Croda UK presented data on the impact of white base ingredients choice in meeting the performance brief for lipstick formulations. At the present time, there is little information known about how different waxes such as candelilla, carnuba and ceresin, which are common in lipstick formulations, solidify different oils. Her presentation focused specifically on the firmness of the base and correlated this to the hardness and pay-off of the fully formulated stick. Hardness values were assessed using the texture analyzer and the pay-off assessment was conducted utilizing mechanical arm apparatus. In all 19 oils were assessed: castor oil, PPG-15 stearyl ether, propylene glycol isostearate, isostearyl isostearate, isostearyl alcohol, triisostearin, trimethylolpropane triisostearate, polyglyceryl-3 diisostearate, ethylhexyl cocoate, ethylhexyl pelargonate, pentaerythrityl tetracaprylate/caprate, PPG-3 benzyl ether myristate, isotridecyl isononanoate, di-PPG-2 myreth-10 adipate, PCA dimethicone, pentaerythrityl isostear- ate/caprate/caprylate/adipate, PPG-3 hydrogenated castor oil, di-PPG-3 myristyl ether adipate and pentaerythrityltetra- isostearate.
All the oils were assessed for oil/wax interaction. Several of the oils, formed very good oil/wax structures and hence they could be used to increase the hardness of soft lipstick formulations. More specifically, castor oil proved to be a high firming oil (9000g) along with di-PPG-2 myreth-10 adipate (8600g), polyglyceryl-3 diisoso- stearate (7600g) and PPG-3 hydrogenated castor oil (6400g). Isostearyl alcohol proved to be a low structuring oil at 2500g.
Her study clearly established that the firmness of the lipsticks inversely correlate to the level of pay-off allowing both firmness and pay-off to be controlled by altering the formulation as required.