• Login
    • Join
  • Subscribe Free
    • Magazine
    • eNewsletter
    Checkout
    • Magazine
    • News
    • Formulary
    • Exclusives
    • Top Companies
    • Raw Materials
    • End-User
    • Packaging
    • Directories
    • Events
    • Jobs
    • More
  • Magazine
  • News
  • Formulary
  • Exclusives
  • Top Companies
  • Raw Materials
  • End-User
  • Packaging
  • Directories
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Current / Back Issues
    Features
    Columns
    Editorial
    Digital Edition
    eNewsletter Archive
    Our Team
    Editorial Guidelines
    Subscribe Now
    Advertise Now
    Top Features
    In Full Bloom

    All Inclusive

    Make It Yours

    The Making of a Beauty Entrepreneur

    A Stellar Lineup of Speakers Is Set For Happi’s Anti-Aging Conference
    Online Exclusives
    Association News
    Breaking News
    Financial News
    Industry News
    International
    Marketing News
    New Products
    News Front
    Packaging News
    Patents
    Personnel
    Regulations
    Snapshots
    Top News
    Live From Shows
    Top News
    CVS Debuts 'Real Life' Campaign

    Estee Lauder Signs Karlie Kloss

    BET and Beautycon Launch Beauty-Focused Content

    Colgate and Phelps Continue Water Conservation Program

    LAPD Seizes Contaminated, Counterfeit Cosmetics
    International Top 30 Report
    Top 50 Report
    Top Companies
    36. Helen of Troy

    35. WD-40 Company

    19. Clarins

    30. Yanbal

    12. Natura
    Actives
    Functional Ingredients
    Pigments
    Polymers
    Preservatives
    Surfactants

    ACI Meets the Chemists of Tomorrow...Today

    LAPD Seizes Contaminated, Counterfeit Cosmetics

    Silab Celebrates 10 Years in China

    A Gentle Approach to Acne

    #superherobeauty from Grant Industries
    Air Care/Environmental Fragrance
    AP/Deo
    Color Cosmetics
    Disinfectants
    Fine Fragrance
    Hair Care
    Household Cleaning
    I&I Marketplace
    Laundry Care
    Oral Care
    OTC/Medicated
    Packaging
    Personal Cleansers
    Skin Care
    Sun Care
    Testing

    BET and Beautycon Launch Beauty-Focused Content

    Colgate and Phelps Continue Water Conservation Program

    How To Maintain a Premium Beauty Brand’s Desirability

    My Generation

    ACI Meets the Chemists of Tomorrow...Today
    Lab Equipment
    Mixing
    Packaging
    Testing

    Overnight Labels Unveils Updated Website

    Eliminating the Idea of 'Waste'

    Hallu Puts New Spin on Bath Bomb

    A Pure Pair of Pampers?

    Cosmetic Must-Haves from Qosmedix
    Contract Manufacturing / Private Label Directory
    Buyer's Guide
    Add New Company
    Corporate Profiles
    Corporate Capabilities
    International Buyers Guide Companies
    Federal Package

    Lipotec USA, Inc.

    Lubrizol

    Tropical Enterprises International, Inc.

    BASF Corporation
    Brand Building Seminar
    Live From Shows
    Meetings
    Webinars
    Snapshots
    • Magazine
      • Current / Back Issues
      • Features
      • Editorial
      • Columns
      • Digital Edition
      • eNewsletter Archive
      • Subscribe Now
      • Advertise Now
    • Breaking News
    • Formulary
    • Directories
      • Buyer's Guide
      • Contract Manufacturing / Private Label Directory
      • Corporate Profiles
      • Add Your Company
      • Corporate Capabilities
    • Raw Materials
      • Actives
      • Functional Ingredients
      • Pigments
      • Polymers
      • Preservatives
      • Surfactants
    • End-User
      • Air Care/Environmental Fragrance
      • AP/Deo
      • Color Cosmetics
      • Disinfectants
      • Fine Fragrance
      • Hair Care
      • Household Cleaning
      • I&I Marketplace
      • Laundry Care
      • Oral Care
      • OTC/Medicated
      • Packaging
      • Personal Cleansers
      • Skin Care
      • Sun Care
      • Testing
    • Packaging
      • Lab Equipment
      • Mixing
      • Packaging
      • Testing
    • Top Companies
      • International Top 30 Report
      • Top 50 Report
    • Online Exclusives
    • Experts Opinion
    • Slideshows
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Infographics
    • Blog
    • Whitepapers
    • Surveys
      • R & D Salary Survey
      • Sales & Marketing Salary Survey
    • Job Banks
    • Anti-Aging Conference
    • Events
      • Industry Events
      • Live from show Events
      • Webinars
    • About Us
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise With Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    Features

    How Enzymes Can Reduce the Environmental Impact Of Liquid Detergents

    One cost-neutral solution is to replace surfactants with a multienzyme solution that improves the environmental impact of a liquid laundry detergent without compromising performance.

    Anne Merete Nielsen, Dr. Teresa J. Neal, Sandra Friis-Jensen and Amulya Malladi, Novozymes09.07.10
    Environmental regulations and consumer concerns are putting pressure on the entire detergent value chain to offer more environmentally friendly detergents to the market. The environmental impact of doing laundry in the U.S. is primarily affected by the raw materials used to manufacture detergents and, more importantly, the temperature used in washing machines.
    The development of new enzyme solutions by Novozymes allows detergent manufacturers to reduce the environmental impact of their detergents by replacing traditional chemicals such as surfactants with a multienzyme solution. This can be done without compromising performance or cost, while at the same time allowing for good cleaning performance at low wash temperatures.

    Enzymes are natural substances that are efficient at low concentrations, readily degradable in the environment, deliver low toxicity levels, and most importantly, perform well at low wash temperatures. Thus, detergent manufacturers can reformulate their detergents with enzymes to make them more sustainable and attractive to their customers.
     

    Novozyme researchers insist enzymes boost performance and lower environmental impact of liquid detergents.
    It has already been illustrated that there are significant environmental benefits from replacing surfactants with enzymes in a powder detergent in the European market (Nielsen et al., 2007) and from reformulation of detergents for the French market (Dewaele, 2006).

    This article highlights the environmental benefits of cost-neutrally replacing surfactants with enzymes in a standard mid-tier U.S. liquid laundry detergent, assessed by doing wash experiments and life cycle assessments (LCA) through ISO 14040-series where all significant processes from “cradle to grave” are included.

    Test Method
    This study uses a mid-tier U.S. liquid detergent formulated by Novozymes. The detergent was compared to two U.S. mid-tier commercial detergents through wash trials and was found to be similar in performance. Since liquid detergents do not contain a significant amount of builders, it was assumed that reducing the dosage of the detergent is equivalent to reducing the surfactant content. In this study, three sets of detergents were compared. The cost of all three detergents is the same.

    1. Baseline detergent (100% surfactant): The standard or baseline detergent was a mid-tier detergent containing only a protease.

    2. Medium compacted detergent (90% surfactant + 1% multi-enzyme solution): The detergent where 10% of the detergent content was replaced with 1% enzyme content (protease, amylase and mannanase).

    3. Highly compacted detergent (70% surfactant + 2.55% multi-enzyme solution): The detergent where 30% of the detergent content was replaced with 2.55% enzyme content (protease, amylase, mannanase, cellulase and lipase).

    The wash performance was tested in a Whirlpool top loader washing machine (WTW5300VW) at a heavy wash program (15 minutes) and a medium load (63 L) – and the wash experiments were repeated four times.

    The stain set used is a broad range of consumer-relevant enzyme- and surfactant-sensitive stains regularly applied for testing in North America. The applied conditions (ballast: 2.7kg total fabric load; wash temperature: 59°F and 86°F) represent current standard U.S. wash conditions (in U.S. washing machines temperature settings of cold equal 30°C, 65–85°F; warm equals 40°C, 105°F; while hot equals 50–95°C, 120–200°F).

    After wash, all swatches were air dried overnight and remissions of the dry swatches were measured at 460nm using a ColorEye reflectometer.
    Fig. 1: The new detergents with multienzyme solutions and reduced surfactant content show better wash performance

    The wash performance was measured across 22 enzyme- and detergent-sensitive consumer-relevant stains. It is clear from the above graph that even when the temperature is reduced from 86°F to 59°F, there is improvement in wash performance. Wash conditions: U.S. full wash, Whirlpool top loader, 2.7kg total fabric load.

    Environmental Assessment
    The study is based on LCA principles, where all significant processes in the product chain from raw material extraction through production and use to final disposal are included. The LCA is performed according to the method described by JRC (2010) and environmental modeling is facilitated in the SimaPro 7.1.8 LCA software.

    The study compares the impacts that are generated when the new, enzyme-rich detergents are introduced with the impacts that are avoided when the conventional detergents are replaced.

    The considered environmental impact categories include:
    • Global warming (g CO2 equivalents),
    • Acidification (mg SO2 equivalents) and
    • Nutrient enrichment (mg PO42- equivalents).

    The wash trial results clearly show that when surfactants are replaced by enzymes the wash temperature can be reduced from 86°F to 59°F while at the same time improving performance (Fig. 1).

    There are some minimal losses on specific stains (Fig. 2, next page)—but on average the end consumer will experience the enzyme reformulated detergents to offer improved or similar wash performance even as the wash temperature is reduced.

    Environmental Impact
    The positive environmental effects of replacing surfactants with enzymes and of reducing wash temperature from 86°F to 59°F are shown in Fig. 3 (p. 000) for a broad range of impact categories for the detergent with 70% surfactant and a multienzyme solution. The impact is nearly the same for the detergent with 90% surfactant with a multienzyme solution.

    The results show that the environmental impact caused by enzyme production is generally quite small compared to the environmental impact savings obtained by the wash temperature reduction and the reduced use of surfactants. The overall reduced environmental impact reflects the use of a small amount of enzyme having a relatively small impact on the environment as opposed to a much larger amount of surfactants and a relatively large amount of electricity.

    For global warming, the saved environmental impacts are primarily caused by reduced production of surfactants and propylene glycol and the reduction of the wash temperature.

    Agricultural land savings are primarily caused by surfactant ingredients such as fatty alcohol that is produced from vegetable oil because agricultural land is used for palm oil plantations. Freshwater use show similar results, because of the irrigation water used in the palm oil plantations.

    Seen in a life cycle perspective, the new, enzyme-reformulated detergents result in environmental benefits on all investigated impact categories (see Fig. 3).

    For global warming, a decreased wash temperature will result in savings of 300g CO2 eq. per wash, and benefits from the change in composition of the detergent are 6.0g CO2 eq. per wash for the detergent reformulated with 1% weight multienzyme solution, and 17g CO2 eq. per wash for the detergent reformulated with 2.55% weight multienzyme solution.

    Toxicity
    Water bodies around the world are facing manmade pressures that are harming the aquatic environment. Toxicity, acidification, and loss of habitat due to sinking water levels are contributing significantly to diminishing the health of aquatic flora and fauna. Globally, nearly 22% of all evaluated aquatic vertebrates are on the endangered list—this includes fish and amphibians.

    Fig. 2: Enzyme reformulated detergents show better performance on most relevant stains

    The detergent with 90% surfactant + 1 wt% multienzyme solution and the detergent with 70% surfactant and 2.55% weight multienzyme solution show improved performance at 86°F on most relevant stains. There are some losses on specific stains, however, these losses are negligible and the end user will see a marked improvement in wash performance with the new enzyme reformulated detergents. Wash conditions: U.S. full wash, Whirlpool top loader, 2.7kg total fabric load.

    Detergents entering these water bodies through the wash water contribute in part to increasing the toxicity of the water bodies. In the U.S., most of the wash water goes through wastewater treatment facilities (UNSD, 2010). However, European Chemical Agency estimates that in Europe nearly 20% of this water, due to overflow, goes directly into environment without processing (ECA, 2008), and similar conditions may very well apply in U.S. as well.

    By replacing a percentage of surfactant with readily biodegradable and significantly less toxic enzymes, the toxicity contribution of detergents to the planet’s water bodies can be reduced dramatically (see Fig. 3, next page).

    In this study, eco-toxicity assessments of both surfactants and enzymes after use were measured based on a screening method, calculation of critical dilution volume (CDVtox). CDV offers a way to understand the potential toxicity of cleaning products and toxic chemicals on the water system. CDV measures how much water is needed to neutralize a substance. It takes 240 times less water to neutralize enzymes than surfactants (Fig. 3). If all washes in the U.S. were done with detergents that were reformulated to have only 70% surfactant and 2.55% weight multienzyme solution—the equivalent to more than 3,600 million Olympic swimming pools worth of water couldbe safeguarded against toxicity from detergents in one year.

    Conclusions
    The cost-neutral replacement of surfactant with enzymes in a standard laundry detergent allow for reduction of laundry wash temperatures and toxicity impact on water bodies without compromising the total wash performance. Enzyme use is small compared with surfactant savings and the environmental impact caused by the extra enzyme use is insignificant compared with the savings obtained by reducing the surfactant content and particularly reducing consumption of energy used to heat wash water.

    Fig. 3: Enzyme-based formulas have little environmental impact

    This graph clearly shows the environmental impact from added inputs (enzymes), saved inputs (chemical detergent ingredients) and saved heat from reduced wash temperature when a consumer changes from the standard detergent to use a detergent with 70% surfactants plus a multienzyme solution and reduces wash temperature from 86°F to 59°F. All data is per one wash of 2.7kg laundry.

    Data quality assessments and sensitivity analyses show that exact results are uncertain and depend on the magnitude of the temperature reduction, the applied water heating systems and a range of other factors, but they also show that the overall conclusions of the study are robust. The enzyme-rich detergent examined in this study costs the same as the conventional detergent and substantial environmental impact improvements can be realized while saving on the consumers' electricity bill.

    Surfactant savings and temperature reducing results in a savings of 317g CO2 eq. per wash for a detergent where the surfactant content is reduced by 30%. If all consumers in North America washed their hot/warm washes at the low temperature of 59°F, the savings in fossil fuel would equal nearly 21 million barrels of oil or 19 fully loaded oil tankers. The savings to the environment will be nearly 7.4 million tons of CO2, which equal the annual emissions from two million cars.

    These are significant environmental savings and Novozymes is pleased to join forces with colleagues in the detergent industry across the value chain to realize this potential in the coming years.

    References
    Dewaele J. Pant R. Schowanek D. Salducci N (2006): Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Ariel “Actif à froid” (2006), a laundry detergent that allows washing at colder wash temperatures with previous Ariel laundry detergents (1998. 2001). Available at http://www. scienceinthebox.com/ en_UK/pdf/ Ariel%20Actif% 20a% 20Froid%20LCA%20report%20Nov%202006.pdf

    European Chemical Agency (2008):Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.16: Environmental Exposure Estimation.Available athttp://guidance. echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance _document/information_requirements _en.htm

    Joint Research Center (2010): International Reference Life Cycle Data System. General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment – Detailed Guidance. European Union. Available at http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications

    Nielsen PH. Oxenbøll KM. Wenzel H (2007): Cradle to gate environmental assessment of enzyme products produced in Denmark by Novozymes A/S. Int J LCA OnlineFirst. http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.08.265.1


    United Nations’ Statistical Database (2010). Map over percentage of population connected to urban waste water collecting system. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/environment/wastewater.htm


    About the Authors
    Anne Merete Nielsen is senior life cycle economist, Dr. Teresa J. Neal is regional marketing manager, Sandra Friis-Jensen is global launch manager and Amulya Malladi is global communication manager, all with Novozymes. For more information about enzyme-rich detergents, call or email: Teresa J. Neal at +1 919-494-3064 or tjna@novozymes.com
    Related Searches
    • system
    • research
    • safety
    • Detergent
    Related Knowledge Center
    • Laundry Care
    • Surfactants

    Related Features

    • Functional Ingredients | Laundry Care | Polymers | Surfactants

      Unconventional Approaches

      Suppliers show up in force to showcase their solutions at the American Cleaning Institute’s Annual Meeting & Industry Convent
      Tom Branna, Editorial Director 03.01.18

    • Functional Ingredients | Laundry Care | Polymers | Surfactants
      Loads of Work To Do

      Loads of Work To Do

      More than 1000 industry executives from around the world attend the ACI Annual Meeting & Industry Convention.
      Tom Branna, Editorial Director 03.01.18

    • Actives | Color Cosmetics | Functional Ingredients | Hair Care | Personal Cleansers | Pigments | Polymers | Preservatives | Skin Care | Sun Care | Surfactants | Testing
      In-Cosmetics Global Is Next Month

      In-Cosmetics Global Is Next Month

      The leading global personal care ingredients event will focus on R&D when chemists head to The Netherlands, April 17-19, 2018
      03.01.18


    • Functional Ingredients | Hair Care | Laundry Care | Personal Cleansers | Skin Care | Surfactants
      Palm-Tastic!

      Palm-Tastic!

      There are many benefits to formulating home and personal care products based on RSPO certified oil palm products
      Rita Koester, BASF Personal Care and Nutrition GmbH 03.01.18

    • Air Care/Environmental Fragrance | AP/Deo | Color Cosmetics | Disinfectants | Fine Fragrance | Hair Care | Household Cleaning | I&I Marketplace | Insect Control | Laundry Care | OTC/Medicated | Packaging | Personal Cleansers | Skin Care | Sun Care | Testing

      Trade Association Directory 2018

      Following are the contact details of trade associations frequently mentioned in the pages of Happi.
      02.01.18

    • Actives | Air Care/Environmental Fragrance | Disinfectants | Functional Ingredients | Household Cleaning | I&I Marketplace | Insect Control | Polymers | Surfactants | Testing
      What’s in a Name?

      What’s in a Name?

      This year, CSPA will change its name to the Household & Commercial Products Association.
      Tom Branna, Editorial Director 01.04.18


    • Actives | Color Cosmetics | Functional Ingredients | Hair Care | Personal Cleansers | Polymers | Preservatives | Skin Care | Sun Care | Surfactants
      Society Shines at Annual Meeting

      Society Shines at Annual Meeting

      An exciting roster of speakers, a fresh venue and a new executive director created a wave of enthusiasm.
      Tom Branna, Editorial Director 01.04.18

    • Actives | Fine Fragrance | Functional Ingredients | Hair Care | Personal Cleansers | Polymers | Skin Care | Surfactants
      New Wave

      New Wave

      Rising beauty brands are leading the way with innovative launches.
      Melissa Meisel, Associate Editor 01.04.18

    • Functional Ingredients | Laundry Care | Polymers | Surfactants
      Clean & Fresh

      Clean & Fresh

      Demand for advanced formulas drives the laundry category as marketers turn up the volume on fragrance notes.
      Tom Branna, Editorial Director 01.04.18


    • Actives | Disinfectants | Functional Ingredients | Household Cleaning | Polymers | Surfactants

      New Raw Materials for Household Cleaning Products

      Below are new ingredients for household cleaning product formulations. For more information contact the suppliers directly.
      11.01.17

    • Functional Ingredients | Household Cleaning | I&I Marketplace | Polymers | Surfactants
      Expand Your Horizons

      Expand Your Horizons

      What’s ahead for the global cleaning industry? CSPA’s tri-annual New Horizons conference looks into the future and makes some
      Tom Branna , Editorial Director 11.01.17

    • Actives | Disinfectants | Functional Ingredients | Household Cleaning | Surfactants
      Come Clean

      Come Clean

      Consumers want more information about the ingredients in many of the products they use and consume every day, but does that i
      Christine Esposito, Associate Editor 11.01.17

    • Functional Ingredients | Personal Cleansers | Surfactants
      A Clean Slate

      A Clean Slate

      Regulators, marketers and consumers are asking themselves: “What does it mean to be clean?” and “Am I too sensitive?”
      Tom Branna, Editorial Director 11.01.17

    • Actives | Color Cosmetics | Functional Ingredients | Hair Care | Pigments | Polymers | Preservatives | Skin Care | Sun Care | Surfactants | Testing
      In-Cosmetics North America Returns to New York City

      In-Cosmetics North America Returns to New York City

      Attendees at this month’s event to get consumer insights from industry leaders and learn about the latest ingredients
      10.02.17

    • Air Care/Environmental Fragrance | AP/Deo | Color Cosmetics | Disinfectants | Fine Fragrance | Hair Care | Household Cleaning | I&I Marketplace | Insect Control | Laundry Care | Oral Care | OTC/Medicated | Personal Cleansers | Skin Care | Sun Care
      Contract Manufacturing/Private Label Directory

      Contract Manufacturing/Private Label Directory

      When you need a manufacturing partner, you need to begin your search here.
      10.02.17

    Breaking News
    • New Regulations for Nail Salons
    • Registration Opens for Cosmoprof
    • CVS Debuts 'Real Life' Campaign
    • FTC's Final Order in Deceptive Advertising of Anti-Aging Skin Care
    • Estee Lauder Signs Karlie Kloss
    View Breaking News >
    CURRENT ISSUE

    April 2018

    • The Power of Bio-Inspiration
    • In Full Bloom
    • All Inclusive
    • Make It Yours
    • The Making of a Beauty Entrepreneur
    • A Stellar Lineup of Speakers Is Set For Happi’s Anti-Aging Conference
    • View More >

    Copyright © 2018 Rodman Media. All rights reserved. Use of this constitutes acceptance of our privacy policy The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Rodman Media.