Company News, Event Coverage, Regulations

ACI Questions EPA Label Program

Questions Safer Product Labeling Program

Author Image

By: TOM BRANNA

Editor

The American Cleaning Institute says it is concerned with the approach taken by EPA to develop the Safer Product Labeling Program and associated Standard. In contrast to tenets from organizations such as the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), EPA has disregarded a number of guidelines related to the process of developing standards, measuring their environmental effectiveness, and managing the standards programs.

As for measuring environmental effectiveness, the Standard does follow some of the principles of green chemistry (intrinsic hazard and ingredient disclosure), but falls short in several areas such as measurability and significant measurable difference, identification of ‘hotspots’, and consideration of lifecycle stages, according to ACI.

Furthermore, in several sections, the term “fragrance” is used without definition, including the use of “fragrance-free” as a label option. ACI recommends defining the term ‘fragrance’ with the input of industry experts or replace the term in the Standard with “fragrance material.”

According to ACI, the Standard wrongly prohibits dual functionality ingredients. Many materials with aromatic properties including solvents and surfactants are formulated into products for their cleaning functions. As these ingredients are evaluated against their functional class criteria and not the Safer Choice Interim Fragrances Criteria, their exclusion from a “fragrance-free” product is inappropriate. ACI recommends this criterion be deleted from the Standard.

Further, ACI is concerned that the definition of “fragrance-free” as described in the Standard is inconsistent with industry practices. This inconsistency could lead to confusion because products with “fragrance-free,” “scent-free,” “no perfume” or other like-worded phrases on their label can earn the Safer Choice label and maintain their fragrance claims. The SPLP should have consulted experts and stakeholders in order to understand fragrance industry standards before establishing a separate criterion for “fragrance-free.” ACI therefore recommends the “fragrance-free” option be omitted from the Standard.

More info: American Cleaning Institute, Washington, DC; Tel: 202-347-2900; Email: [email protected]; Website: www.cleaninginstitute.org;

Keep Up With Our Content. Subscribe To Happi Newsletters