Mail slow? View this month’s issue, right online!
Our digital version is easy to share with colleagues. See this month’s issue and digital versions of previous issues too.
Get your products and services in front of thousands of decision-makers. View our print and online advertising options.
A one-on-one interview conducted by our editorial team with industry leaders in our market.
Discover the newest promotions and collaborations within the industry.
Easy-to-digest data for your business.
Shampoos, conditioners, colorants and styling products created by leading industry suppliers.
Creams, serums, facial cleansers and more created by leading suppliers to the skincare industry.
Detergents, fabric softeners and more created by leading suppliers to the fabric care industry.
Eyeshadows, lipsticks, foundations and more created by leading suppliers to the color cosmetics industry.
Bodywashes, and bar and liquid soaps created by leading suppliers to the personal cleanser industry.
Hard surface cleaners, disinfectants and more created by leading suppliers to the home care industry.
Eau de parfums and eau de toilettes, body sprays, mists and more created by leading suppliers to the fragrance industry.
UV lotions and creams, self-tanners and after-sun products created by leading suppliers to the suncare industry.
A detailed look at the leading US players in the global household and personal products industry.
A detailed look at the leading players outside the US in the global household and personal products industry.
Looking for a new raw material or packaging component supplier? Your search starts here.
When you need a new manufacturing partner or private label company, get started here.
Who owns that? To keep track of leading brands and their owners, click here.
An annual publication, Company Profiles features leading industry suppliers with information about markets served, products, technologies and services for beauty, pesonal care and home care.
New products and technologies from some of the brightest minds in the industry.
A one-on-one video interview between our editorial teams and industry leaders.
Listen to the leading experts in the global household and personal products industry.
Comprehensive coverage of key topics selected by sponsors.
Detailed research on novel ingredients and other solutions for the global household and personal care industry.
Company experts explain what works and why.
Exclusive content created by our affiliates and partners for the household and personal care industry.
Exciting news releases from the household and personal care industry.
Our targeted webinars provide relevant market information in an interactive format to audiences around the globe.
Discover exclusive live streams and updates from the hottest events and shows.
Looking for a job in the household and personal care industry, search no further.
Follow these steps to get your article published in print or online
What are you searching for?
Judge won't dismiss case against Greenpeace activists.
July 2, 2014
By: TOM BRANNA
Editor
A judge has refused to dismiss burglary charges against nine Greenpeace activists who staged an eye-catching protest involving a zip-lining tiger at Procter & Gamble's headquarters in downtown Cincinnati. Hamilton County Judge Robert Winkler rejected arguments from defense attorneys that the activists were simply exercising their free speech rights when they slipped past P&G's security on March 4 and used a zip line to unfurl giant banners from the consumer products company's two towers as a helicopter filmed them. They were protesting P&G's use of palm oil, saying the oil is tied to tropical forest destruction in Indonesia. One of them was dressed as a tiger to represent endangered species that live in the rainforest. The activists, who all live out-of-state, were arrested on charges of burglary and vandalism and spent one night in jail before being released the next day on $50,000 bond each. They have pleaded not guilty. Attorneys for the activists argued in court Wednesday that the burglary charges against them should be dismissed, saying that they were engaging in constitutionally protected political speech. Prosecutors argued that regardless of their political message, the activists committed crimes and caused damage in the way they conveyed their message. Authorities have said property damage, including broken window locks, totaled some $17,000. At the time of a grand jury indictment, Prosecutor Joe Deters said 24 police officers and two companies of firefighters were diverted to the protest. “The First Amendment does not operate to permit defendants to damage or tamper with private property in order to convey their message,” according to a recent court filing by the prosecution.
Enter your account email.
A verification code was sent to your email, Enter the 6-digit code sent to your mail.
Didn't get the code? Check your spam folder or resend code
Set a new password for signing in and accessing your data.
Your Password has been Updated !