06.28.10
Private label scored strong gains across all major U.S. retail channels in 2009 as consumers increasingly switched from national brands and drove store brands to all-time highs in both volume and total revenue, as well as market share, according to latest industry statistics published by the Private Label Manufacturers Association.
On the heels of a powerful growth surge for store brands in 2008, sales of the products increased again last year by 1.8 billion units while national brand units were down 2.1 billion.Along with the conversion of a full percentage point in unit share from national brands to the private label column, store brands added $2.7 billion in value to reach $86.4 billion in total sales. National brand sales increased $1.6 billion, but those gains were largely, if not entirely, the result of higher prices, according to PLMA.
While overall sales for the nation’s retail chains reflected the sluggishness of the economy in general —dollar growth in all three mainstream channels, supermarkets, drug chains and mass merchandisers -- was a lackluster 0.8 and unit sales declined 0.2%—store brands were far and away the industry’s star performers.
In supermarkets, store brands reached an historic high of 23.7% in unit share. Private label units were up +6.4% for the year compared to a decline of 1.7% for national brands. The growth in store brand units (1.7 billion) more than offset the erosion of national brands (1.5 billion), resulting in a net gain for the channel as a whole and stemming a multi-year trend of overall unit losses in U.S. supermarkets.
On the revenue side, store brands accounted for 90% of all gains in supermarkets, adding $1.5 billion in new sales (2.9%), while national brands were virtually flat (0.1%). Moreover, the decline in national brand units suggests that even their modest sales gain of $200 million was a result of price inflation. Overall, store brands sales in supermarkets reached $55.5 billion and dollar market share climbed to 18.7%; both figures were new all-time highs.
In drug chains, market share in units reached 16.3% as volume grew by 4.0%. National brands recorded a loss of 3.9% in units. As in supermarkets, the absolute growth of 461 million store brand units across all departments more than made up for the channel’s loss of national brand volume (378 million).
Store brands were responsible for 52% of the total sales growth in drug chains, adding close to a half billion dollars in new sales. Store brand revenue grew at a vigorous +8.8%, while national brands tacked on only 1.2% in sales. The total value of store brands sales in drug chains was $6.1 billion, and dollar market share was 14.1%; both figures were also record.
“The past year has even greater significance since it is the first full year of the impact of the recession," said Brian Sharoff, PLMA president. "Not surprisingly, the statistics document the amazing increases in store brand popularity. But as most market researchers know, the growth of store brands is by no means a recessionary phenomenon. Its success began years before the current downturn and is rooted in increasing assortment, quality ingredients, innovative product concepts, and retailer commitment,” he added.
More info: www.plma.com
On the heels of a powerful growth surge for store brands in 2008, sales of the products increased again last year by 1.8 billion units while national brand units were down 2.1 billion.Along with the conversion of a full percentage point in unit share from national brands to the private label column, store brands added $2.7 billion in value to reach $86.4 billion in total sales. National brand sales increased $1.6 billion, but those gains were largely, if not entirely, the result of higher prices, according to PLMA.
While overall sales for the nation’s retail chains reflected the sluggishness of the economy in general —dollar growth in all three mainstream channels, supermarkets, drug chains and mass merchandisers -- was a lackluster 0.8 and unit sales declined 0.2%—store brands were far and away the industry’s star performers.
In supermarkets, store brands reached an historic high of 23.7% in unit share. Private label units were up +6.4% for the year compared to a decline of 1.7% for national brands. The growth in store brand units (1.7 billion) more than offset the erosion of national brands (1.5 billion), resulting in a net gain for the channel as a whole and stemming a multi-year trend of overall unit losses in U.S. supermarkets.
On the revenue side, store brands accounted for 90% of all gains in supermarkets, adding $1.5 billion in new sales (2.9%), while national brands were virtually flat (0.1%). Moreover, the decline in national brand units suggests that even their modest sales gain of $200 million was a result of price inflation. Overall, store brands sales in supermarkets reached $55.5 billion and dollar market share climbed to 18.7%; both figures were new all-time highs.
In drug chains, market share in units reached 16.3% as volume grew by 4.0%. National brands recorded a loss of 3.9% in units. As in supermarkets, the absolute growth of 461 million store brand units across all departments more than made up for the channel’s loss of national brand volume (378 million).
Store brands were responsible for 52% of the total sales growth in drug chains, adding close to a half billion dollars in new sales. Store brand revenue grew at a vigorous +8.8%, while national brands tacked on only 1.2% in sales. The total value of store brands sales in drug chains was $6.1 billion, and dollar market share was 14.1%; both figures were also record.
“The past year has even greater significance since it is the first full year of the impact of the recession," said Brian Sharoff, PLMA president. "Not surprisingly, the statistics document the amazing increases in store brand popularity. But as most market researchers know, the growth of store brands is by no means a recessionary phenomenon. Its success began years before the current downturn and is rooted in increasing assortment, quality ingredients, innovative product concepts, and retailer commitment,” he added.
More info: www.plma.com